
I remember when I was a sophomore in high school, I went to Los Angeles with my dad for the state Academic Decathlon competition (I know, dorky, but it helped get me into college!) We stopped by the LA County Museum of Art and explored some of the modern art collection. Modern art always annoyed me to some degree (how a painted white canvas can be worth a million bucks, I'll never know), and I remember coming across one particularly frustrating painting.
It was a famous work by René Magritte. It was simple. Just a beige canvas, a perfectly styled pipe in the center. And below that, the words "Ceci n'est pas un pipe." ("This is not a pipe.") I can still remember my incredulity at seeing the painting:
Me: This is ridiculous! What does he mean? Of course it's a pipe!
Dad: OK, OK, but is it really a pipe? Can you smoke it?
Me: No...
Dad: Can you touch it?
Me: No...
Dad: So it isn't really a pipe. It's a picture of a pipe. It isn't reality, it's an imitation of reality.
I don't know if I fully appreciated that message at the time. But it's one I’ve come to understand today. There is a difference between a man and a picture of a man. The picture is an illusion, a fantasy. It’s an expression of what that man wishes himself to be perceived as; and an impression of what the viewer wishes to perceive. The man is the man.
I realize that posting pictures of ourselves online is a double-edged sword: On the one hand, you put your image out there and hopefully find support and meet people who like what they see; on the other, your image can become the object of interest, not you.
And there's a fundamentally important question that we need to be honest about: Does posting images online help us find meaningful relationships/encounters/friendships? Or does it enable objectification that expressly impedes anything meaningful? My personal answer is in the gray area somewhere between the two.
To find that answer, we must first look at the causes. Ultimately, I think objectification in our community sprouts from two sources: our obsession with a single body part and—to a much larger degree—the slow process by which we gradually learn to live with (and eventually love) this kink.
Q: WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT FLESHY THING AROUND A BELLY?
A: A PERSON
I joked about it in my last post, but easily the single most common greeting I get online is “How’s the belly?” Most guys don’t want to know how I’m doing, they want to see what’s shakin with my food processor (and I don’t mean my Cuisinart). Our kink is focused heavily on a single body part—the belly—and that simple fact makes it all too easy to de-humanize the guys we see online.
I’d try to act incredulous, but I’d be a hypocrite for doing so. Because I too am guilty of objectification of my brethren from time to time. I’ve spent many a subway ride ogling the belly stuffed into a too-small shirt. And I sometimes let my fantasies run wild looking at pictures of icons like sfgutmuscle and hogbelly, ignoring the fact that I know them personally.
And I too am guilty of manipulating the “reality” of my own pictures. I’ve taken photos to accentuate my finer features and at times pushed my belly out more to create a larger silhouette. I’ve posed in ways to project a more masculine image, to project a certain fantasy. And I certainly have enjoyed the attention paid to my body, my belly, my accomplishments.
We love bellies. There’s not much we can do about it. We like what we like. And sometimes that love can lead to objectification. But I think we can love a single body part without always objectifying the man who possesses it. Most of the time, objectification is more the product of our state-of-mind, than our simple love of bellies. It’s less about the photos we take or the image we project and more about the mentality of the viewer.
In the end, it’s mostly about the walls the viewer had built in his own head.
MR. GORBACHEV, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL
Walls are useful. They help keep things out that we don’t want in, and they protect us from possible threats. But they can also be harmful.
When coming to terms with our kink, we go through certain phases. First is denial—we’ve all been there. Then when we get over that, there’s a cautious acceptance: “Yes, I have this kink, but it’s not really a part of me. It’s just some weird quirk that I dabble in.” It’s at this moment in our development that we begin building a wall in our brain. On one side of the wall are all our gainer kinks, fantasies and desires. On the other side, is everything else.
I’ll be the first to admit that when I started to meet men online, I objectified and de-humanized them. I made sure I kept my encounters with anyone from the gainer community separate from my “normal” life. To me, it was safer to keep them on one side of the wall I’d built. It had nothing to do with whether or not they had photos or videos (many just didn’t back then, it was the dark ages of 2002, after all).
As any of you who’ve tried the same know, that’s not a charade you can keep up for long. Sooner or later, you have to start melding the two worlds. And as soon as I started tearing down that wall, the objectification of other guys with this kink began to fade.
De-humanizing someone who is perceived as a threat is a perfectly natural human response—it's what enables soldiers to kill their enemies with little hesitation or allows you to turn your nose at homeless panhandlers without feeling like a total dick. Though this reaction is natural, it's far from ideal. De-humanizing others allows us to be OK with the shitty things we do to them. It’s why some guys can stand you up in the rain and not think twice.
For those who still have some or all of that barrier up—and let’s be honest, that’s probably a majority of guys who have this kink—the walled world is all they know. It’s just easier to think of a man as an object, the sum of his parts (his pictures, videos and web chat) than to see him as simply a person.
CECI EST UN HOMME
So what does all this mean for that nagging question: Should we or shouldn’t we post photos of our ourselves online? Well, regardless of whether or not we post photos or videos of ourselves, some will objectify us and some will not. Those who are more at ease with their kink will see us as equals—as real human beings—no matter what and those with heavy gainer baggage will continue to see us as objects of lust.
The good news is that the more guys who are confident and honest about themselves online, who stand for something positive and empowering, the more our community’s collective confidence seems to come out. And as that happens to a greater degree, we’ll see more of those walls come tumbling down.
While I’ve felt objectified more than a few times since first posting pictures of myself online, I can safely say that the reward—the truly amazing mix of guys I’ve met and friendships I’ve forged over the years—has been well worth the trouble.
The ones who matter know that “This is a man.”
It was a famous work by René Magritte. It was simple. Just a beige canvas, a perfectly styled pipe in the center. And below that, the words "Ceci n'est pas un pipe." ("This is not a pipe.") I can still remember my incredulity at seeing the painting:
Me: This is ridiculous! What does he mean? Of course it's a pipe!
Dad: OK, OK, but is it really a pipe? Can you smoke it?
Me: No...
Dad: Can you touch it?
Me: No...
Dad: So it isn't really a pipe. It's a picture of a pipe. It isn't reality, it's an imitation of reality.
I don't know if I fully appreciated that message at the time. But it's one I’ve come to understand today. There is a difference between a man and a picture of a man. The picture is an illusion, a fantasy. It’s an expression of what that man wishes himself to be perceived as; and an impression of what the viewer wishes to perceive. The man is the man.
I realize that posting pictures of ourselves online is a double-edged sword: On the one hand, you put your image out there and hopefully find support and meet people who like what they see; on the other, your image can become the object of interest, not you.
And there's a fundamentally important question that we need to be honest about: Does posting images online help us find meaningful relationships/encounters/friendships? Or does it enable objectification that expressly impedes anything meaningful? My personal answer is in the gray area somewhere between the two.
To find that answer, we must first look at the causes. Ultimately, I think objectification in our community sprouts from two sources: our obsession with a single body part and—to a much larger degree—the slow process by which we gradually learn to live with (and eventually love) this kink.
Q: WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT FLESHY THING AROUND A BELLY?
A: A PERSON
I joked about it in my last post, but easily the single most common greeting I get online is “How’s the belly?” Most guys don’t want to know how I’m doing, they want to see what’s shakin with my food processor (and I don’t mean my Cuisinart). Our kink is focused heavily on a single body part—the belly—and that simple fact makes it all too easy to de-humanize the guys we see online.
I’d try to act incredulous, but I’d be a hypocrite for doing so. Because I too am guilty of objectification of my brethren from time to time. I’ve spent many a subway ride ogling the belly stuffed into a too-small shirt. And I sometimes let my fantasies run wild looking at pictures of icons like sfgutmuscle and hogbelly, ignoring the fact that I know them personally.
And I too am guilty of manipulating the “reality” of my own pictures. I’ve taken photos to accentuate my finer features and at times pushed my belly out more to create a larger silhouette. I’ve posed in ways to project a more masculine image, to project a certain fantasy. And I certainly have enjoyed the attention paid to my body, my belly, my accomplishments.
We love bellies. There’s not much we can do about it. We like what we like. And sometimes that love can lead to objectification. But I think we can love a single body part without always objectifying the man who possesses it. Most of the time, objectification is more the product of our state-of-mind, than our simple love of bellies. It’s less about the photos we take or the image we project and more about the mentality of the viewer.
In the end, it’s mostly about the walls the viewer had built in his own head.
MR. GORBACHEV, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL
Walls are useful. They help keep things out that we don’t want in, and they protect us from possible threats. But they can also be harmful.
When coming to terms with our kink, we go through certain phases. First is denial—we’ve all been there. Then when we get over that, there’s a cautious acceptance: “Yes, I have this kink, but it’s not really a part of me. It’s just some weird quirk that I dabble in.” It’s at this moment in our development that we begin building a wall in our brain. On one side of the wall are all our gainer kinks, fantasies and desires. On the other side, is everything else.
I’ll be the first to admit that when I started to meet men online, I objectified and de-humanized them. I made sure I kept my encounters with anyone from the gainer community separate from my “normal” life. To me, it was safer to keep them on one side of the wall I’d built. It had nothing to do with whether or not they had photos or videos (many just didn’t back then, it was the dark ages of 2002, after all).
As any of you who’ve tried the same know, that’s not a charade you can keep up for long. Sooner or later, you have to start melding the two worlds. And as soon as I started tearing down that wall, the objectification of other guys with this kink began to fade.
De-humanizing someone who is perceived as a threat is a perfectly natural human response—it's what enables soldiers to kill their enemies with little hesitation or allows you to turn your nose at homeless panhandlers without feeling like a total dick. Though this reaction is natural, it's far from ideal. De-humanizing others allows us to be OK with the shitty things we do to them. It’s why some guys can stand you up in the rain and not think twice.
For those who still have some or all of that barrier up—and let’s be honest, that’s probably a majority of guys who have this kink—the walled world is all they know. It’s just easier to think of a man as an object, the sum of his parts (his pictures, videos and web chat) than to see him as simply a person.
CECI EST UN HOMME
So what does all this mean for that nagging question: Should we or shouldn’t we post photos of our ourselves online? Well, regardless of whether or not we post photos or videos of ourselves, some will objectify us and some will not. Those who are more at ease with their kink will see us as equals—as real human beings—no matter what and those with heavy gainer baggage will continue to see us as objects of lust.
The good news is that the more guys who are confident and honest about themselves online, who stand for something positive and empowering, the more our community’s collective confidence seems to come out. And as that happens to a greater degree, we’ll see more of those walls come tumbling down.
While I’ve felt objectified more than a few times since first posting pictures of myself online, I can safely say that the reward—the truly amazing mix of guys I’ve met and friendships I’ve forged over the years—has been well worth the trouble.
The ones who matter know that “This is a man.”
